The Olympics sparked an interesting debate between myself and my husband this past week. Someone asked us, "If you could win a gold medal in any sport, which one would you choose?"
My immediate response?
My husband's response?
Absolutely no hesitation by either of us. And so the debate began. My husband said he would want to be the fastest runner in the world - and apparently winning the 100m at the Olympics makes this so. I would want to be the fastest too - but in a sport that involves endurance, fortitude and mental toughness. Although he would probably argue that winning the 100m requires those things too.
He mentioned that there is no room for error in the 100 meters. A glitch at the starting line could mean you lose the race. But in a marathon, you have time to correct mistakes. On the other side, there is a lot more time for mistakes to be made.
It's interesting that this debate is a tiny glimpse into who we are as runners. I'm all about distance. For me, it's not always about how fast I run (although I do love a PR like anyone else!) but it's more about how far I run.
My husband is all about speed. Just this morning he took off on his run and I said to him, "Run fast!" He responded, "Is there any other way?" He has no interest in running long distances - a 5k is plenty long for him. But you better believe he's aiming to cross that finish line first.
So now I'm curious...what would your answer to the question be?
If you could win a gold medal in any sport, which one would it be? And what does your answer say about you?